Sunday, May 14, 2006

The Reformed Faith and Starbucks



Rick Warren will soon be on Starbucks coffee cups!

"As for the Sudan, I completely agree with you that we haven't had to go to the firing line for our faith lately. What should we do about that?" - Charles

This comment is only the latest to spur me on towards thinking about how American/Western Christians deal with the differences of life experience compared to African Christians. My struggle: getting whole milk instead of skim milk in my extra-grande-cupalicious-mocha-frappucinno-light. Their struggle: getting shot in the head while taking care of children. Does anyone else see a disconnect? Didn't Jesus say we would encounter persecution for our faith? Is Starbucks really the agent of that persecution? I doubt it.

So the question becomes "What do we do about it as good evangelicals in this situation?" I think the obvious answer which keeps coming up in most circles is to become a missionary so that you get shot in the head. The down side to this is that not many people really want (feel called?) to this from America, so instead we just feel guilty about going to Starbucks or whatever other Christian/Capitalist venture we support. I think both these solutions are really Satanic tricks to be honest and I have been struggling to find a good alternative that fits with God's personal call on my life (and others by extension) and the overall Biblical message of cosmic redemption. So this will be a short exposition on some conclusions I have come to and maybe a practical application or two. Yeah right.

I think the main problem in the West which leads into this mission/guilt complex is that we don't correctly understand our situation in the world. For some reason we (I) think that the West is as Jesus as it is going to get and this produces the uncomfortable position of not wanting to go on to something else (like Africa, which doesn't have Crispy Creme or Jesus). But this is absolutely false! I think in many ways American (and the West) is in worse shape as compared to Africa on the kingdom of God front. Now don't get me wrong, I am not saying that marytrs in Africa should be happy to be there as opposed to being stuck in a stipmall, but what I am saying is that Christianity and everything else is clear cut in Africa in many ways it is not in America, or at least this is what I hear from missionaries who have worked there. And that is what I think the majority of evangelican Christians in America are probably called to: get America to love Jesus. Seriously! I am not going to cart out the "back in the good old days" slogan appealing to Leave It to Beaver or any other sureal impression of America; that is not necessary. One only has to look around and think about our culture and it is immeadiately obvious that Jesus is not done with us yet so we shouldn't be resting on our laurels.

What then should America look like? Let me quote a bit from Abraham Kuyper, the Dutch prime minister who made a valiant effort at bringing a Western country under Christ:

"One desire has been the ruling passion of my life. One high motive has acted like a spur upon my mind and soul. And sooner than that I should seek escape from the sacred necessity that is laid upon me, let the breath of life fail me. It is this: That in spite of all worldly opposition, God's holy ordinances shall be established again in the home, in the school and in the State for the good of the people; to carve as it were into the conscience of the nation the ordinances of the Lord, to which Bible and Creation bear witness, until the nation pays homage again to God."

Wow. Just re-read that passage about his driving goal and passion in life. Amazing. It is the "pseudo-Christian" attitude of seperation of Church and everything which has gotten us into so much trouble in the States, I think. We evangelicals have been afraid to stand up for the "holy ordinances" of Christ and have settled for more meager results. But that is not the vision of the Scriptures nor is it the vision of the Reformed Faith which finds a creed in another one of Kuyper's statements:

"There is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is sovereign over all, does not cry: 'Mine!'"

The Reformed Tradition, especially as seen through Kuyper, Dooyeweerd, and Van Til, gives us the necessary tools with which to make this nation and world God's kingdom. In this all embracing view there is no seperate space for anything but the Lordship of Christ. This whole progamme rests on the foundational principle that life and everything in it is not for man but for God alone. Listen to Cornelius Van Til:

"It is the Bible alone that speaks of such a God. And the Bible speaks of his absolute authority. This God always speaks with authority. This God of the Bible, who speaks authoritatively through his Word, is the presupposition of the intelligibility of human experience. He is recognixed in the Reformed Faith as the final reference point for all human predication. In this respect the Reformed Faith really stands squarely opposed to all forms of non-Christian thinking. Non-Christian thinking takes man as the final reference point in predication. It places man where the Reformed Faith recognizes God."

Now I am well aware that these all embracing claims will sound quite outdated and outlandish to "postmodern" ears which hate anything that smacks of totality, but I really think we need to get over the metanarrative phobia. The insight of recent philosophy is important and crucial to tear down man made structures of thought and imperialism; but if those places are not filled with the Sovereign God's imperialistic vision of the kingdom of God, we are really left with nothing but a jumbled mess. So I acknowledge the need to be careful with totalitarian language while at the same time being willing to concede that the Covenant LORD might actually have an overall plan which He is working in redemption history with us as key players in the effort.

So the question becomes: "What does this Reformed position look like on the ground?" Due to length of article I will have to leave some implications I have come up with until next post (particularly in what I see my calling to be: education. The "Christ in Math class" will be addressed!), which is good because I think this total vision of Christ's Lordship over all needs to seep into our Western minds. But as one quick implication, I think it means we need to read our Bibles (especially the OT) while sipping on our extra-mocha-grande-cupalicious-frappucinno with skim or whole milk.

9 Comments:

At 1:29 pm, Blogger Hans-Georg Gadamer said...

Erik,
That Van Til quote is in honour of you!

 
At 7:11 am, Blogger Mair said...

Great post, Hans. We are in a small group at church and we're reading the catechesis (did I spell that right?) that St. Cyril gave to the newly baptized. Last week, we got into a "what would this look like in our time?" conversation. One thing I kept thinking about is that for Cyril's coverts, being a Christian meant a TOTAL rejection of one grand narrative (the Greek cosmology of gods, civil duties, and all the cultic weirdness that came with it) and the choosing of another (the Christian story of redepmtion, and the call to holiness). We can't figure out what this would look like in our culture because we never reject anything wholesale; we just take bits and pieces of various narratives and try to piece together something moderately coherant that give our lives some sort of meaning. That's the problem. We need to remember that Christianity is a meta-narrative and that it should be one that guides our lives.

So, what would it look like? I think a huge part of it is community and service in the name of Christ.

I'm anxious to hear what you think it should look like.

 
At 9:42 am, Blogger RJ said...

Cornelius? Hooray OPC!

"It is the "pseudo-Christian" attitude of seperation of Church and everything which has gotten us into so much trouble in the States, I think."

In line with Wright's "The Challenge of Jesus", from my understanding there's no such thing as the "Sovereign God's imperialistic vision of the kingdom of God." From what I've gathered, Wright's position is that Christ's kingdom does not attempt to resurrect Israel politically through the mechanisms of the state. He specifically calls his followers to "repent" of social agendas that bring them into conflict with the state, specifically rebellion against Roman, and instead focus on living lives of forgiveness, sacrifice, and service.

You obviously know Wright better than I do, and I'm not finished with the book yet, but this "imperialism" that includes the legislative or state-enforced "holy ordinances" seems profoundly anti-Christian to me. If there's one thing Christian history teaches, it's that compulsory Christian societies are absolutely the worst form of government for the cause of Christ. So I guess my question is, how does this square with Christ, and how is your vision any different than the orthodox monarchial one that ripped Europe to shreds and destroyed orthodoxy as we knew it?

 
At 1:23 pm, Blogger Hans-Georg Gadamer said...

Redness - I think there is certainly caution with taking this approach; any imperialistic ideal will tend to focus on power rather than service, you are right about that. I guess the important thing to mention is this is not about resurrecting the nation of Israel - the Church is the new people of God. But it is equally not about sitting by while modern day Rome takes over culture. Tom Wright is really good on this point I think because his phrase "Jesus is Lord and Caesar is not" works today as well as the first century. He is always taking flak here in England because he is a bishop who is outspoken about political and social issues, ranging from gobal debt relief to cathedral housing. So I think Wright is totally on line with this project, which is one reason why he still describes himself as "Reformed."
I think you make a good point about fighting the tendancy of making Christianity complusary. This is exactly the monarchical model you pointed out which tore Europe apart. The trick is making Christianity significant and yet not forced. I think this starts with regaining the notion of Church and community built around that structure. A first step would be identifying ourselves more strongly with particular churches and working to make those actual communities which we live, work, and worship in (not 24/7, but not just Sunday mornings). this might allow for pockets of "resistence" to spring up which were not forced but drew people in due to the wonder of a Christian community and the Spirit ruled dynamics involved. I don't know exactly what this looks like in practice yet, but what you are doing with your church I think is moving towards this model in significant ways. So we don't force people into a Christian community, but rather "force" them in the sense of incredible appeal and beauty of that community. This produces outposts of the Kingdom of God much like the early Church which expand out to take more members into the community through all sorts of means.
This is all thinking out loud (obviously!) but I was reminded how much we need to figure something out as far as the Kingdom goes today when I was being bombarded by pornographic images in the local gym which were passed off as music videos. What are we going to do about this? What am I going to do about this? This is starting to sound a bit radical reformation and antibaptist at this point, so I think there is something missing (no way those guys were right!), maybe the holes will be filled in subsequently. I just think it is important to emphazies that we need to take the total commitment to Christ seriously and recognize (with Wright) that Rome is alive and well; yet the Kingdom is advancing.

I also noticed that Mair has pointed out this community thing quite well, as expected. Thanks Mair!

 
At 6:59 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Hans,

Greetings to fellow Reformed Anglican!

Glad to have found your website! What are you studying at Oxford and which church do you attend? I am now back in Penang, Malaysia, but studied at Aberystwyth U (law), and am a member of the Church of England (Continuing).

In Christ,
Jason

 
At 12:27 pm, Blogger RJ said...

Yeah, that sounds good. I'm just cautious because the things I've seen Christians, as an organization, "do" about things like pornography and violence is to bitch, moan, boycott, and generally piss people off. A great example right now is the widespread response to the Da Vinci code. How do we address a popular re-hashing of Jesus life which undermines our message? The boycott and argue approach does not work and it's something I'm completely against.

I guess I'd rather work on trying to make the community a place where pornography doesn't make sense. I want to work positively against things like this, by adding things that are beneficial to the community rather than being focused on taking away the things we don't like. That's my only concern with anything that smacks of the "take this country/school/work place/world/whatever back for God!" battle cry.

 
At 6:03 am, Blogger E. Twist said...

Predication!!! Love it!!!

 
At 5:29 pm, Blogger Charlie J. Ray said...

Excellent blog. My sympathies lie with yours!

Charlie

 
At 4:22 am, Blogger Patrick Conley said...

I find myself wondering if the presence of the Kingdom of God is hindered by the "Western model" or simply better hidden than in stated African contexts (and the like). The "at-handness" of the Kingdom, as proclaimed by Jesus, seems to me to suggest not that the Kingdom is "losing ground" when popular notions of Christianity-meets-Western-consumerism emerge, but perhaps that it does obscure the view. To my thinking, the issue at stake is not "reclaiming for Christ" areas of contemporary culture and practice, as if the sovereignty of God were in question, but rather unveiling the eyes and unstopping the ears of perceivers, ala 2 Cor. 4...so that, as redhurt put it, for example, pornography would no longer make sense.

Now, as to how this is done, well, I would venture some guesses, but I'll wait for hans's post on Christ in Math class!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home